Site icon North Gwinnett Voice

Arbitration panel denies Hall County’s objection to Buford’s plans to annex, rezone property

An annexation dispute between the city of Buford and Hall County that was brought before the Georgia Department of Community Affairs has reached a conclusion.

On June 7, a five-member arbitration panel formed by the DCA denied Hall County’s objection to the annexation and rezoning of property at 6533 McEver Road into the city of Buford.

Developer CA Ventures had requested annexation of the 34-plus acres and a rezoning to M-1 (light industrial). According to the city of Buford, the proposal includes two warehouses totaling about 396,000 square feet.

Hall County’s objections to the annexation and rezoning included the material increase in infrastructure demands on the county that the rezoning could create; that the proposed rezoning would allow for a significantly more intense use of the property than that under the county’s existing zoning; that the annexation and rezoning would be inconsistent with the county’s comprehensive plan; and that the area has been developed with residential subdivisions.

A previous application requesting a rezoning came before the Hall County Board of Commissioners, and the request was withdrawn due to what the county described as “considerable opposition.” A subsequent request for annexation and rezoning was made to the city of Flowery Branch but was also withdrawn.

The arbitration panel’s considerations and findings include:

The city of Buford must provide water and sewer services to the property. Further, any improvements within the vicinity of the property, such as right-of-way improvements, will fall to the city of Buford and the property owners.

Bryan Kerlin, city manager for Buford, said the annexation and rezoning process for the property will begin again given there’s no objection by Hall County in Superior Court.

A request for comment made to Hall County Board of Commissioners Chairman Richard Higgins was declined, with the county’s public information officer citing potential litigation.

Please follow and like us:
Exit mobile version